Wednesday, 15 September 2021

Queer Studies

 

 Hello Friends! 


I am Nidhi Jethava. In this blog I am going to discuss to key concepts and some of the examples of queer studies. 

 

 Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Home | American University,  Washington, DC


Key concepts :-


What is queer studies ?


What is Lesbian Feminism ?


Zimmerman’s surveys 


What Lesbian/ Gay critics do 


Example 




So let’s discuss some important concept about queer studies. 

 

What is queer studies ?

Queer studies, sexual diversity studies, or LGBT studies is the study of issues relating to sexual orientation and gender identity usually focusing on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, gender dysphoria, asexual, queer, questioning, intersex people and cultures.



What is Lesbian Feminism ?


Lesbian feminism, a subset of feminism that emerged in the mid-to-late 20th century at the convergence of the women’s movement, the gay rights movement, and the sexual revolution. Lesbian feminists consider same-sex relationships legitimate and use their lesbian identity as a basis for community building and collective action. Lesbian feminism challenges the perception of heterosexuality and male supremacy as “normal” and presents alternative ways of thinking about gender and power.




According to Zimmerman that a lesbian/gay text is: 


1. One which is written by a lesbian (if so, how do we determine who is a lesbian, especially if we take the anti-essentialist line just outlined?).


 2. One written about lesbians (which might be by a heterosexual woman or man, and which would also come up against the problem of deciding what a lesbian/gay person is in non-essentialist terms). 


3. One that expresses a lesbian 'vision' (which has yet to be satisfactorily described). 



Some of the important writers and writtings about queer studies :-


1.See Teresa de Lauretis, Queer Theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities, 1991

2.Annamarie Jagose, Queer Theory: An Introduction, 1996. 

3. Judith Butler’s  Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity 



What lesbian/gay critics do 

1. Identify and establish a canon of 'classic' lesbian/gay writers whose work constitutes a distinct tradition. These are, in the main, twentieth-century writers, such as (for lesbian writers in Britain) Virginia Woolf, Vita Sackville-West, Dorothy Richardson, Rosamund Lehmann, and Radclyffe Hall. 

2. Identify lesbian/gay episodes in mainstream work and discuss them as such (for example, the relationship between Jane and Helen in Jane Eyre), rather than reading same-sex pairings in non-specific ways, for instance, as symbolising two aspects of the same character (Zimmerman). 

3. Set up an extended, metaphorical sense of 'lesbian/gay' so that it connotes a moment of crossing a boundary, or blurring a set of categories. All such 'liminal' moments mirror the moment of selfidentification as lesbian or gay, which is necessarily an act of conscious resistance to established norms and boundaries. 

4. Expose the 'homophobia' of mainstream literature and criticism, as seen in ignoring or denigrating the homosexual aspects of the work of major canonical figures, for example, by omitting overtly homosexual love lyrics from selections or discussions of the poetry of W. H. Auden (Mark Lilly). 

5. Foreground homosexual aspects of mainstream literature which have previously been glossed over, for example the strongly homo-erotic tenderness seen in a good deal of First World War poetry. 

6. Foreground literary genres, previously neglected, which significantly influenced ideals of masculinity or femininity, such as the nineteenth-century adventure stories with a British 'Empire' setting (for example those by Rudyard Kipling and Rider Haggard) discussed by Joseph Bristow in Empire Boys (Routledge, 1991). 



Considering above point Let’s try to evaluate some of the literary work fromm the point of view of queer studies. 


So, firstly I would like to give example of popular movie ‘Vita and Virginia’ 

 


 


In this movie we come across with the idea about lesbian relationship between famous writer Virginia woolf and Vita Sackille Waste. 


That relationship is the subject of a new film, Vita & Virginia, which includes lines lifted straight from the literary duo’s love letters. Starring Elizabeth Debicki as Woolf and Gemma Arterton as Sackville-West, the film from director Chanya Button is set against the backdrop of bohemian high society in 1920s London with a host of characters based on real-life people. Here’s the true story behind Vita & Virginia, Woolf and Sackville-West’s passionate relationship and the great literary work it inspired. 

 

Another example is from movie Shubh Mangal Zyada Savdhan :-  

 

Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan Movie Review: Ayushmann Khurrana's SHUBH MANGAL  ZYADA SAAVDHAN is a decent attempt and makes an interesting comment on  homophobia which exists in our country. 

 

WATCH VIDEO! Ayushmann Khurrana To Romance Jitendra Kumar In Shubh Mangal  Zyada Saavdhan 


film Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan by Hitesh Kewalya.

This movie is about two gay person who love each other. After so long, finally Bollywood movies try to capture this kind of movie. The homosexual relationship between Aman and Kartik is very romantically portrayed with the kissing in the train to holding each other’s back no matter what. At times, people may try to assign the binaries of being feminine and masculine to any of the two. But again the stereotyping is kept at bay with both characters displaying both the traits in their action.


Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan: Milestone In Queer Cinema

In this movie we found one marriage scene and there at finally Tripathi family knows about their son’s homosexuality.  Movie depicted the conflict well and how the family tries to stop them. 

 Homophobia :-

In this movie their is symbol of Kali Gobi which represent the term homophobia (dislike of or prejudice against gay people). 

เคก्เคฐीเคฎ เค—เคฐ्เคฒ เค•े เคฌाเคฆ เคถुเคญ เคฎंเค—เคฒ เคœ्เคฏाเคฆा เคธाเคตเคงाเคจ เคฎें เคฒเคก़เค•ी เคจเคนीं เคฒเคก़เค•े เคธंเค— เค‡เคถ्เค•  เค•เคฐेंเค—े เค†เคฏुเคท्เคฎाเคจ เค–ुเคฐाเคจा, เคฆेเค–िเค เคซिเคฒ्เคฎ เค•ा เคฎเคœेเคฆाเคฐ เคŸीเคœเคฐ 

 Kali Gobi is the homophobia that resides in people’s heart, and they think they are right in enforcing it on others. But in the end, it is a rotten vegetable, not safe to be eaten. It has to be burnt from our systems with acceptance. Nobody can control how and what others may feel, and it is no one’s business to control who should be loved by whom.

 

Thank you.... 





Saturday, 11 September 2021

Deeno Daan: Rabindranath Tagore

 Hello Readers! 


I am Nidhi Jethava and a student of MK Bhavnagar University. In this blog I am going to discuss a very interesting and controversial poem by Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore named ‘Deeno Daan’. This poem is originally written in Bengali. Tagore's original date mark is at 20th of Shravan, 1307, which happened to fall on August 5th of this year. 



Poem :-


‘There is no god in that temple, said the hermit’: Rabindranath Tagore



Said the royal attendant, “Despite entreaties, king,

The finest hermit, best among men, refuses shelter

In your temple of gold, he is singing to god

Beneath a tree by the road. The devout surround him

In numbers large, their overflowing tears of joy

Rinse the dust off the earth. The temple, though,

Is all but deserted; just as bees abandon

The gilded honeypot when maddened by the fragrance

Of the flower to swiftly spread their wings

And fly to the petals unfurling in the bush

To quench their eager thirst, so too are people,

Sparing not a glance for the palace of gold,

Thronging to where a flower in a devout heart

Spreads heaven’s incense. On the bejewelled platform

The god sits alone in the empty temple.”


At this,

The fretful king dismounted from his throne to go

Where the hermit sat beneath the tree. Bowing, he said,

“My lord, why have you forsaken god’s mighty abode,

The royal construction of gold that pierces the sky,

To sing paeans to the divine here on the streets?’

“There is no god in that temple,” said the hermit.


Furious,

The king said, “No god! You speak like a godless man,

Hermit. A bejewelled idol on a bejewelled throne,

You say it’s empty?”

“Not empty, it holds royal arrogance,

You have consecrated yourself, not the god of the world.”

Frowning, said the king, “You say the temple I made

With twenty lakh gold coins, reaching to the sky,

That I dedicated to the deity after due rituals,

This impeccable edifice – it has no room for god!”

Said the tranquil hermit, “The year when the fires

Raged and rendered twenty thousand subjects

Homeless, destitute; when they came to your door

With futile pleas for help, and sheltered in the woods,

In caves, in the shade of trees, in dilapidated temples,

When you constructed your gold-encrusted building

With twenty lakh gold coins for a deity, god said,

‘My eternal home is lit with countless lamps

In the blue, infinite sky; its everlasting foundations

Are truth, peace, compassion, love. This feeble miser

Who could not give homes to his homeless subjects

Expects to give me one!’ At that moment god left

To join the poor in their shelter beneath the trees.

As hollow as the froth and foam in the deep wide ocean

Is your temple, just as bereft beneath the universe,

A bubble of gold and pride.”


1) The poem was written 120 years (approx.). Can you find any resemblance between the poem and the pandemic time? 


Answer :- 


The poem ‘ Deeno Daan’ discusses the same situation in this corona pandemic time also. We  have the same situation in this century. As we all know this 2020 year has brought a pandemic named corona. The same event happened in India in Ayodhya. In this poem there is very interesting talk between the hermit and king.  The king wanted the holy hermit to stay in the golden temple but the hermit refused to live there because there is no God in the temple. Temple has the pride and power of a king. God was exiled when kind refused to give shelter when their citizens had no shelter. The hermit said that, at that time with civilians God also exiled.  Now it talks about the relevance of Ram Mandir, when our  Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid down the first bricks of the much-contested Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. Thousands of people are dying due to corona. Hospital has no bed, no oxygen cylinder and so many people meet death lack of doctors that time our kind was busy with #Mandir_Nirman. 


2) Why do you think the King is angry with the Sage?


Answer :- 


Hermit speaks truth to the king. He talks about reality. King said that he builded gold temple and God is not in his gold temple. As a king he has to save civilize first and when people went for shelter in the difficult time king exiled them and that time God also went with them. So the sage speaks the bitter truth which hurts the pride of the king. He thought that God loves only rich people but it is not so. In the original lines of the poem we are also aware about this. 


Furious,

The king said, “No god! You speak like a godless man,

Hermit. A bejewelled idol on a bejewelled throne,

You say it’s empty?”


King thought that the sage was a godless man. King might think that the golden temple is the only place for God and God is only there. It symbolically suggests the mentality of the people who are at the highest position. King furious said its cost is "two million gold coins," The hermit wanted to say that God has the universe to stay. God is in humanity, simpyth and it is your duty as a king to save and protect the life of people. King can not get the point because he becomes blind with pride, power and arrogance. 



3) Why do you think the Sage refuses to enter the temple?


Answer :-


The sage knew that when the people needed shelter, the king refused them to give shelter. Now the king thought that the sage would come to the temple because it is built with gold. No, God is not in any so-called golden temple. No God is in humanity, in compassion not in any temple. The sage is the true devotee of God. That’s why he refuses to enter the temple. Last line of the poem is very fascinating. It clears the whole idea.


“You have exiled the one who loves the devout.

Now send the devout into the same exile, king.”


The sage said that by exiling people you also exiled God. Now I am a devotee of them and so exiled him also because God is not in the temple.



4) Can there be any connection between the text of the poem and the verdict of Ayodhya Ram Mandir?  


Answer :- 


Yes, Here in this poem there is some connection between the text of the poem and the verdict of Ayodhya Ram Mandir.


This poem was first posted on Facebook by Banojyotsna Lahiri, an alumna of Presidency University and JNU, she explained how the poem was written exactly 120 years ago, according to the Bengali calendar. 






On 5th august 2020, in Ayodhya Pm Narendrabhai was busy with #Bhumi_Pujan while In the country there might be 40000+ corona cases. People are constantly dying. 


News18:- 


“August 5th marked a historic day in India when Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid down the first bricks of the much-contested Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. The ceremony was marked with much fanfare and celebrations. The celebrations were in the middle of a pandemic that has gripped the world. On the same day, deaths from Covid-19 in India crossed the 40,000 mark, the fifth highest in the world, even as the country recorded its biggest single-day surge in fatalities at 918 on Wednesday, with the count crossing 900 for the first time.” 



Thank You...



Wednesday, 8 September 2021

An Astrologer's Day : R. K. Narayan

  Hello everyone! 


I am Nidhi Jethava and a student of MK Bhavnagar University. In this blog I am going to ponder some of the interesting questions about 'An Astrologer's Day' As we all know, ‘An Astrologer’s Day’ is a very fascinating short story.




 ‘An Astrologer’s Day’ is written by a well-known short story writer R.K.Narayan. R.K. Narayan is famous for his short stories. Rasipuram Krishnaswami Iyer Narayanaswami was born in1906. 


Here I am putting the link of original text:-

An Astrologer's Day


Here I am putting the story adaptation :-



Q.1 How faithful is the movie to the original short story?


Answer :-


While discussing the film adaptation, we can see that there is so much correspondence between a story and adaptation. Plot is going the same way as it is in the story. One might say that it's quite faithful to the original story. Just two scenes are there which are not in the original test. One is the astrologer’s wife at the initial part and his reveal of his crime through the story of money. 


Q. 2    After watching the movie, has your perception about the short story, characters or situations changed?


Answer :- 


Actually the plot of the movie is similar, so after watching it, it will be tough to say that my perception has changed at all. Yes but while discussing character and situation it affected me. Before watching it would be hard for me to clearly imagine the character but adaptation helped us to understand it more clearly. 


Q. 3   Do you feel ‘aesthetic delight’ while watching the movie? If yes, exactly when did it happen? If not, can you explain with reasons?


While watching the adaptation I could not feel ‘aesthetic delight’. There are some reasons.

  • First and foremost reason is the change of setting. In the short story setting is important. R.K.Narayan is famous for his fictional town ‘Malgudi’. So if the filmmaker used the setting of ‘Malgudi’ town then it might give an appropriate idea. 

  • Inappropriate introduction of the most important character ‘An Astrologer’, when we read the story then we found a proper image of an astrologer. In the initial part of the story we can read very knit observations in the story. 

So, considering these points I can say that I can not feel 'aesthetic delight'.


Q.4   Does screening of movies help you in better understanding of the short story?


Answer :-


Yes, movie screening is helpful to understand the story. Sometimes it might happen that we are fed up with reading or we are not interested in reading lengthy things. So adaptation or screening will help us to understand the storyline very well.



Q.5 Was there any particular scene or moment in the story that you think was perfect?


Answer:-


Yes, the communication scene between an astrologer and Guru Nayak is as appropriate as in the story. It has no single change. So we are also aware that that part is the climax of the story and the film adaptation is able to show that scene as it is.


Q.6 If you are a director, what changes would you like to make in the remaking of the movie based on the short story “An Astrologer’s Day” by R.K.Narayan?


Answer :- 


'An Astrologer's Day' is a very eye-catching story. Some good adaptation is also made on it. While discussing the question as a Filmmaker then I would like to do some kind of changing. First the age of astrologers. It might be around forty. My setting might be in some fictional small town like Malgudi. The biggest change is the characterization of Guru Nayak. In the story Guru Nayak blindly trusts an astrologer but my Guru Nayak will cross check what he actually tells and at the end Nayak will catch the real identity of an astrologer.


Thank you....





 






Psychoanalytic Criticism.

Hello Everyone, In this blog, we are going to see these major points How Freudian interpretation works  What Freudian psychoanalytic critics...